Age Discrimination Lawyer in Birmingham, MI

If you've faced age discrimination at work in Birmingham, MI, Scott Batey can help. Nearly 30 years of Michigan employment law experience.

There is a particular kind of frustration that comes with being pushed out of a job you've done well for years. The meetings you're suddenly not invited to. The younger colleague who gets the promotion you were clearly next in line for. The offhand comments about "new energy" or "fresh perspectives" that seem pointed directly at you. You start wondering whether what's happening is real, whether it's legal, and whether anyone will actually listen.

Age discrimination is more common in Michigan workplaces than most employees realize, and it is often subtle enough that workers spend months second-guessing themselves before they ever consider calling an attorney. That hesitation is understandable. It is also costly.

Scott Batey has been practicing employment law in Michigan since 1996. He has seen how age discrimination plays out in real workplaces, from corporate layoffs engineered to push out senior employees to quiet campaigns designed to make experienced workers feel unwelcome until they leave on their own. If you work in Birmingham or anywhere in Metro Detroit and something at work feels wrong, Scott can give you a straight answer about whether what you experienced may have crossed a legal line.

What Is Age Discrimination Under the Law?

Federal Protection: The ADEA

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) is the primary federal law protecting workers from age discrimination. It covers employees and applicants who are 40 years of age or older and applies to private employers with 20 or more employees, as well as federal, state, and local governments.

Under the ADEA, it is unlawful for an employer to discriminate based on age in hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoffs, training, or any other term or condition of employment.

Michigan Protection: The Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act

Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act (ELCRA) provides parallel protections at the state level and, in some respects, offers broader coverage than the ADEA. ELCRA applies to employers with one or more employees, which means smaller Michigan employers that fall below the ADEA threshold may still be covered under state law.

ELCRA prohibits discrimination based on age in employment decisions and works alongside the ADEA to give Michigan workers meaningful options when pursuing a claim.

Who Is Covered

  • Employees 40 and older (under the ADEA)
  • Job applicants, current employees, and in some circumstances former employees
  • Workers at qualifying private employers, public agencies, and labor organizations
  • Michigan employees at smaller employers may have additional protections under ELCRA even if the ADEA does not apply

Common Forms of Age Discrimination in the Workplace

Age discrimination does not always look like a manager saying "you're too old for this job." It is frequently more calculated and harder to name in the moment. Some of the most common patterns Scott sees include:

  • Termination or inclusion in a layoff that disproportionately affects workers over 40
  • Being passed over for promotions given to younger, less experienced colleagues
  • Demotion or reduction in job responsibilities without a legitimate performance reason
  • Exclusion from training programs, leadership development, or key projects
  • Pressure to retire or accept a buyout framed as a "generous opportunity"
  • Harassment based on age, including repeated comments about being "set in your ways," "not keeping up," or "resistant to change"
  • Job postings using coded language like "recent grad," "digital native," or "high energy team" designed to screen out older applicants
  • Performance management that begins only after a company announces workforce restructuring

Age Discrimination vs. General Workplace Unfairness

Not every unfair workplace situation is an unlawful one. Michigan employees are protected from discrimination based on a protected characteristic, which in the age context means being 40 or older. Being treated poorly, passed over arbitrarily, or managed by someone who simply does not like you does not, on its own, create a legal claim.

A viable age discrimination claim typically requires:

  • An adverse employment action (termination, demotion, failure to promote, significant reduction in duties or pay)
  • A connection between that action and your age as a motivating or determining factor
  • Evidence, direct or circumstantial, that supports that connection

Proving an Age Discrimination Claim in Michigan

The Legal Standard

Under the ADEA, the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Gross v. FBL Financial Services established that a plaintiff must prove age was the "but for" cause of the adverse employment action. This is a higher standard than what applies in some other discrimination contexts. It means the evidence must show that the adverse action would not have happened but for the employee's age.

Michigan's ELCRA may allow for a somewhat different analysis in cases involving mixed motives, which is one reason pursuing both federal and state claims is often strategically important.

Types of Evidence in an Age Discrimination Case

Age discrimination is not always stated openly. A claim may be supported by direct comments, differences in how workers are treated, workplace patterns, statistical data, or a combination of several forms of evidence.

01

Direct Evidence

Explicit statements connecting an employment decision to age.

02

Circumstantial Evidence

Patterns, timing, replacements, and surrounding workplace facts.

03

Comparator Evidence

Differences between the treatment of older and younger employees.

04

Statistical Evidence

Workforce data showing a disproportionate impact on older employees.

Explore the Evidence

What Each Type of Evidence May Show

Select a section to view examples and important considerations.

01 Direct Evidence Statements that explicitly reference age

What It Means

Direct evidence may include statements by a supervisor, decision-maker, or another person involved in the employment decision that explicitly connect the decision to an employee’s age.

Examples may include:
  • “We need to bring in younger talent.”
  • “You are overqualified at this stage of your career.”
  • Comments suggesting an employee is too old to adapt or advance.

The context, speaker, timing, and connection between the statement and the employment decision can all be important.

02 Circumstantial Evidence Patterns and surrounding facts that may indicate bias

What It Means

Circumstantial evidence may support an inference of age discrimination even when no one directly states that age was the reason for an employment action.

Relevant circumstances may include:
  • Patterns in how employees over 40 were treated.
  • Discipline or termination following age-related comments.
  • Replacement by a significantly younger employee.
  • Sudden negative reviews after years of positive performance.

Circumstantial evidence is often evaluated collectively rather than as a series of isolated events.

03 Comparator Evidence How similarly situated younger employees were treated

What It Means

Comparator evidence examines whether younger employees in similar positions were treated more favorably under comparable workplace circumstances.

Employee Over 40

Disciplined, denied an opportunity, demoted, or terminated.

Younger Employee

Treated more favorably despite similar conduct or performance.

A useful comparator generally has a similar role, supervisor, performance history, and level of responsibility.

04 Statistical Evidence Workforce data and disproportionate employment outcomes

What It Means

Statistical evidence may be particularly relevant during a layoff, reduction in force, restructuring, or widespread change affecting multiple employees.

Data may examine:
  • The ages of employees selected for termination.
  • The ages of employees retained by the employer.
  • Differences between departments or decision-makers.
  • Whether workers over 40 were disproportionately affected.

Statistical disparities may be relevant, but the size of the workforce, available data, and selection criteria should also be considered.

The McDonnell Douglas Framework

In cases built on circumstantial evidence, courts often apply the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework. In plain terms, this means:

  1. The employee establishes a basic case of discrimination
  2. The burden shifts to the employer to offer a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for the action
  3. The employee then has the opportunity to show that the employer's stated reason is a pretext for discrimination

What to Do If You Think You Have a Claim

Steps to Take Now

  • Document everything. Save emails, performance reviews, org charts, and any written communications that reflect how you were treated or how decisions were made. If someone made an age-related comment, write it down with the date, who was present, and the exact words used.
  • Do not resign without speaking to an attorney. Quitting can complicate or eliminate certain legal claims. If your workplace has become intolerable, you may have options, but talk to Scott first.
  • Avoid signing anything. If your employer has offered a severance or separation agreement, do not sign it under time pressure before getting legal advice. You likely have more time than your employer is suggesting.

Filing Deadlines: Do Not Miss Them

Filing deadlines in age discrimination cases are strict, and missing them can permanently bar your claim.

  • Under the ADEA, Michigan employees must file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) within 300 days of the discriminatory act. Michigan is a deferral state, which means charges may also be filed with the Michigan Department of Civil Rights (MDCR).
  • ELCRA has its own statute of limitations. An attorney can advise you on which deadline applies to your specific situation.
  • Once the EEOC issues a Right to Sue letter, you have 90 days to file a lawsuit in federal court.

What Your Experience Is Worth

Age discrimination is not a minor inconvenience. It is a professional setback that can cost Michigan workers years of earnings, benefits, and career momentum. It sends a message that your experience and your contributions matter less than how old you are. That message is not just insulting. In many cases, it is illegal.

Michigan law, alongside federal law, exists to hold employers accountable when they make employment decisions based on age rather than performance, qualifications, or legitimate business need. But the law only works if you act on it, and acting on it requires knowing whether you have a case and what to do next.

Scott Batey has spent nearly 30 years answering exactly those questions for Michigan employees. He does not hand cases off. He does not practice general law with an employment section buried in the menu. Employment law is the only thing he does, and age discrimination cases are among the most important work he handles.

Your Next Step Starts with a Free Consultation

If you worked in Birmingham or anywhere in Metro Detroit and believe your employer may have discriminated against you because of your age, contact Scott Batey. The consultation is free, confidential, and comes with no obligation. Scott will listen to the facts, tell you honestly whether your situation may support a claim, and explain your options under Michigan and federal law.

Do not wait. Filing deadlines in age discrimination cases are real and unforgiving. The sooner you call, the more options you have.

📞 248-540-6800

📧 sbatey@bateylaw.com

🌐 bateylaw.com

📍 30200 Telegraph Rd., Suite 400, Bingham Farms, MI 48025

Is Your Job, Career, or Reputation at Risk?

Stand up to workplace injustice with proven legal expertise on your side.